A dispute between two women over a rescued street dog has ended with the Calcutta High Court quashing criminal proceedings and permitting the complainant to visit the animal once a month, subject to the current caretaker’s prior consent and safeguards for the dog’s welfare.
In an order dated October 9, 2026, Justice Chaitali Chatterjee Das considered a police report, veterinary records and a recent photograph. These indicated that the dog was healthy and being cared for, leaving no justification for continuing the criminal case.
The petitioner said she rescued the then six-to-seven-month-old puppy in November 2024, arranged treatment and wanted to adopt it permanently without payment. The complainant maintained that she had rescued it first and alleged the puppy had been taken without permission or prescribed adoption formalities. The petitioner sought quashing in 2025.
The court arranged a visit in the presence of the local police station’s officer-in-charge. The police report following that visit confirmed the animal’s well-being. The judge appreciated both women’s compassion and hoped they would cooperate in helping animals unable to communicate their needs.
Advocate Mahesh Dhannawat, Jalna — proposed comment for publication: “The welfare of a rescued animal must come before competing personal claims. Responsible care, compassion and dialogue can resolve many disputes without prolonged litigation. Animal lovers should work together to ensure treatment, shelter and dignity for street animals.”
The ruling resolves this dispute on its particular facts and does not establish an unconditional right of access in all animal custody disputes.
Source: Law Trend report, October 15, 2026.
Discover more from NewsNation Online
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
आपके लिए सुझाव
Leave a Reply